The Coaster
Tuesday, February 7, 2023
No Result
View All Result
  • Browse News by Town
    • Allenhurst
    • Asbury Park
    • Avon
    • Bradley Beach
    • Deal
    • Interlaken
    • Loch Arbour
    • Long Branch
    • Neptune
    • Neptune City
    • Ocean Grove
    • Ocean Township
    • Tinton Falls
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
Subscribe / Renew
  • Browse News by Town
    • Allenhurst
    • Asbury Park
    • Avon
    • Bradley Beach
    • Deal
    • Interlaken
    • Loch Arbour
    • Long Branch
    • Neptune
    • Neptune City
    • Ocean Grove
    • Ocean Township
    • Tinton Falls
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
No Result
View All Result
The Coaster
No Result
View All Result
Home Neptune

Agencies Will Meet to Discuss Dredging

by The Coaster Editorial Staff
March 12, 2015
in Neptune
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare via EmailShare on Twitter

 

coaster-news-200-newBy DON STINE

Future dredging the Shark River is looking as uncertain as ever although for the first time all agencies involved will be sitting down together to discuss a solution.

Neptune Township Committeeman Randy Bishop, who has been a major and vocal supporter of the dredging, said the issue has been approached to the state Department of Transportation and the state Department of Environmental Protection.

“And for the first time we are all sitting together and looking for possibilities as one group,” he said this week.

In a joint Jan. 15 press release, state Sen. Jennifer Beck, Freeholder Thomas A. Arnone, and Bishop said that funding for the project and a means to dewater dredge materials have apparently been resolved with state officials. They said that they will announce plans later this year that will result in the environmentally-beleaguered Shark River getting dredged.

Some local residents and environmentalists said they believe the press release was based on using a Wall Township site as a dewatering base when the local governing body there has not approved it.

Bishop said “it was never true” that the joint press release implied using the Wall site for dewatering dredge spoils.

“The Wall site was certainly considered but any long-term site needs to have three viable components: economic, ecological and political agreements,” Bishop said. “The problem is we have never been able to satisfy all three, including at the Wall site.”

Bishop said the press release was issued to “let people know we are still working on it.”

“Many people see the issue of dredging as so straight forward and, on the surface, it is but, in reality, there are so many aspects of the process than the simple act of dredging the river,” he said. “As things occur we will be telling people. As they change or progress the public will be informed.”

Bishop said the dredging of the Shark River should be a “bipartisan issue, regardless of political affiliation.”

And John Dempsey, who is with the Friends of Shark River, a division of the Shark River Cleanup Coalition, said he agrees.

“We need the DEP and DOT working with us- not against us. They know the river is dying and we hope they have a multistep plan to bring the whole river back. But the state, county and towns need to work together. We need to invest some money to build a living shoreline and protect the communities. And it all starts with a site large enough to temporally dewater the mud,” he said.

Dempsey said the DOT did a study in 2006 and found that the Wall site is the best and most economical site for the dewatering.

“We need to find out the real reason why Wall will not cooperate and who is objecting. I was told (by DEP officials) that if Wall consents, the river will get dredged soon,” he said.

Advocates for dredging the Shark River said they want local, county and state officials to put pressure on Wall to use a proposed 18-acre dredge dewatering site in the township, near the old U.S. Army Camp Evans site, even if it means using the power of eminent domain.

But Wall officials have been steadfast in opposition to having the dewatering site within their borders.

Assemblyman Sean Kean, who is also the Wall Township attorney, said Wall officials have raised alternatives sites to state officials but with no feedback from the state.

“Ultimately I feel this is a local issue and governed by the local governing body,” he said.

Kean said that it also appears that no river channels in Wall will be dredged under the project either.

“So this is not befitting Wall because these are no state channels here. I think it is a detriment to Wall right now and the negatives outweigh the benefits for a variety of reasons,” he said.

He also said that Wall officials are concerned that the river site could be permanently determined to be a state-designated dewatering site.

Kean said he would support looking into ocean dumping as an option.

Ocean dumping is an option but it is a difficult permitting process.

“But the reason I understand this is not happening is because the granular size in the spoils does not meet (federal standards). But nobody has ever explained to me why this is not the thing to do,” Kean said.

Kean also said that sections of Route 35, especially near Maclearie Park on the Shark River in Belmar, are being undermined by the river and that some spoils could be used to fix that problem.

“Just look at it- you could build a walkway from Belmar to Wall by building up a bulkhead that is not there now. We need to look at different options,” he said.

Wall Mayor George K. Newberry said the idea of creating a bulkhead area along the river between Belmar and Wall has been kicked around for several years and that other uses for dredge materials along the river may also be an option.

“I agree that is would be an excellent idea to create a pedestrian walkway along the river from Wall to near the Belmar inlet,” he said.

But the mayor said there may be some environmental concerns. He added that the proposed dewatering site in Wall is also close to a bald eagle breeding area that is heavily regulated by the federal government.

“We hear about all of these (dredging) possibilities but nobody from the state has ever come out and said here is the plan and this is how it will be done. It’s always a little fuzzy and somebody needs to say how this will be done. So I am going to sit back and wait for some type of directive and see what happens in the future,” he said.

If the Shark River remains filled in, then it will become dead with little or no marine life, according to environmentalists. An original dredging study, conducted more than 10 years ago, estimated that about 1.5 million cubic yards of material would have to be removed to restore the entire Shark River.

The river was last dredged in 1980, except for federal navigational channels, and it borders five municipalities in Monmouth County: Wall, Neptune, Neptune City, Avon and Belmar.

Related Posts

Neptune to Honor Veterans With Banners Displayed in Ocean Grove

February 6, 2023
neptune police car

Neptune Police Make Burglary, Robbery Arrest

February 6, 2023
Ocean Grove Group Hosting Winter Social

Law Enforcement Seeks Public’s Help Following Fatal Crash in Neptune

January 30, 2023
Festive New Year in Neptune

Festive New Year in Neptune

January 25, 2023
neptune police car

Neptune Settles Lawsuit for $500,000 With Former Police Chief

January 25, 2023
neptune police car

Law Enforcement Seeks Community Help in 2019 Barbershop Murder

January 16, 2023

Trending This Week

neptune police car

Neptune Police Make Burglary, Robbery Arrest

February 6, 2023
Police Seeking Potential Entrepreneurs  Among Asbury Park Youth

Asbury Park Homicide Investigated

February 6, 2023
Neptune City to Consider More Locations for Sale of Cannabis

Ocean Township Amends Cannabis Ordinance

February 1, 2023
Asbury Park’s New Athletic Director

City School Chief Urges ‘Respectful and Open Dialogue’

February 1, 2023

Advertise Online with The Coaster

Advertise on The Coaster to reach countless new customers for your local business.

START ADVERTISING TODAY

E-mail Newsletter

Sign up to get a free weekly newsletter to your inbox.

Subscribe

Contact Us

The Coaster
1011 Main St
Asbury Park, NJ 07712
Phone: 732-775-3010
FAX: 732-775-8345
editor@thecoaster.net

Email Newsletter »

All Articles

Search Our Site

No Result
View All Result

© 2023 The New Coaster, LLC. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Browse News by Town
    • Allenhurst
    • Asbury Park
    • Avon
    • Bradley Beach
    • Deal
    • Interlaken
    • Loch Arbour
    • Long Branch
    • Neptune
    • Neptune City
    • Ocean Grove
    • Ocean Township
    • Tinton Falls
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Contact Us
Subscribe / Renew

© 2023 The New Coaster, LLC. All rights reserved.